Thursday, April 21, 2016

God’s sovereign choice



Romans 9:6-13

Do you have the understanding that when it comes to the Father in heaven, His ways are higher than our ways and His thoughts higher than our thoughts?  Some of us need that reminder.  Before beginning the subject of God’s purpose of election my prayer is, “Dear Helper, I have little understanding of God’s sovereign choice so open my mind to share what one needs to grasp in such deep waters. 

As we begin in verse six, will you pause and ask the Spirit of Truth to guide your mind and heart as we go forward?  But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but “Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.” This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring. For this is what the promise said: “About this time next year I will return, and Sarah shall have a son.” And not only so, but also when Rebekah had conceived children by one man, our forefather Isaac, though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad—in order that God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls— she was told, “The older will serve the younger.” As it is written, “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.”

Many in the Middle East have named their sons Abraham and view Abraham as the father of himself, but it is a basic misunderstanding of Scripture.  For we know that Abraham had children by Hagar and Keturah, but they were not the children of the promise, the children of the promise came from Sarah’s son Isaac.  Ishmael was the physical son of Abraham and so was Isaac with this exception, the promised son was to come through Sarah, and Isaac was the son of the promise. 

Now before the twins were born to Rebekah and Isaac the Lord made it clear to Rebekah that the older would serve the younger.  This is big, real big, for the first son has rights under the Law of Moses the firstborn may be either the firstborn of his father, who is entitled to receive a double portion of his father's inheritance (compared to the other siblings), (Deuteronomy 21:17) or the firstborn of his mother.  So by the Law of Moses the younger should receive less and play second fiddle to the elder son, but God chose one twin over the other for His divine purpose.  It is clear two nations were coming from these twins, and history makes it very clear they both sinned against God, but only one received grace. 

This is how I understand the election of God, in that He is outside of time, not under it’s control, and because He has been to the beginning and the end of time, He has a complete understanding of our choices and in the case of the twins, God knew that Esau placed little value on his birthright, so little that he was willing to sell it to Isaac for a bowl of stew.  And because of this God rejects Edom and choses Israel as the children of promise.

From the Back Porch,

Bob Rice

No comments: